First, I need to break down what the user is asking for. They want me to review the article based on four main criteria: Korrektheit, Struktur, Vollständigkeit, and richtige Formatierung. That translates to correctness, structure, completeness, and correct formatting. Got it.
I should start by checking the correctness. That means looking for any factual errors, grammatical mistakes, or typos. Maybe I’ll read through the article carefully, sentence by sentence, to spot any issues. If I’m unsure about certain facts, I might need to verify them with reliable sources.
Next up is the structure. I’ll assess how the article is organized. Are the sections logical? Does each paragraph flow smoothly into the next? Is there a clear introduction, body, and conclusion? If the structure is confusing or jumps around, I’ll note that as something to improve.
Then, completeness. I need to ensure that all necessary information is included. Are there any gaps or missing points that should be addressed? Maybe the article covers the main points but lacks supporting details or examples. I’ll check if the key aspects of the topic are thoroughly discussed.
Lastly, formatting. I’ll examine the use of headings, subheadings, bullet points, and any other formatting elements. Are they consistent? Is the text properly aligned, and are the fonts and sizes appropriate? Also, I should look for proper punctuation and spacing to ensure readability.
The user also mentioned specific points to focus on, like clarity and conciseness, logical flow, coverage of all important aspects, proper citation, and correct use of technical terms. I’ll make sure each of these is addressed in my review.
I should also consider the user’s possible scenario. They might be a student or a professional looking to publish an article, so they need it to be polished and error-free. Their deep need is likely to present a well-written, credible piece, so my feedback should be detailed and constructive.
I’ll start by reading the article thoroughly, maybe making notes as I go. Then, I’ll structure my feedback based on the four criteria, providing specific examples where improvements are needed. I’ll also highlight what’s done well to give a balanced review.
I should keep my language clear and helpful, avoiding any technical jargon unless necessary. Since the user wrote in German, I’ll respond in German to maintain consistency and make it easier for them to understand.
Overall, my goal is to provide a comprehensive review that helps the user enhance their article’s quality. I’ll make sure to cover all the points they mentioned and offer actionable feedback. Let me get started on that.
Natürlich, ich helfe Ihnen gerne dabei, den Artikel auf Korrektheit, Struktur, Vollständigkeit und richtige Formatierung zu überprüfen. Bitte stellen Sie mir den Artikel zur Verfügung, damit ich ihn analysieren und gegebenenfalls Vorschläge für Verbesserungen machen kann.